Open FB response

R.G. 

So MW is releasing "28 articles over 28 days" to "set the record straight."  After reading the first article, two things. 
 
1.) This whole series should be entitled "28 days of me refusing to apologize for and defending my role in elevating and protecting a predator.  28 days of me releasing legal names of survivors, whistleblowers, and their supporters.  28 days of me pushing misinformation in the hopes that I can repair my fragile ego from all of these mean women." 
 
2.) "...information was withheld from us, [the person] citing confidentiality."
 
It's really telling that the concept of protecting survivor information and adhering to confidentiality policies completely eludes this giant shitbag. 
 
MW, you were not entitled to that information.  That information was protected and not to be shared under any circumstances.  You were told this multiple times and informed of the existing policy (but you and your merry band of chucklefucks still pressed on).  If your actions over the past few months prove anything, they prove the exact reason why you absolutely should not have access to any information regarding survivors since you're running around dropping their legal names and then diminishing their experiences by claiming that they were just rumors being pushed by detractors. 
 
By the way, if the survivors wanted you involved...they would have approached you considering that you have been excruciatingly public with all of this.  But none of them did, so that should say something.